Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 23

Thread: Superman Returns

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Carmel
    Posts
    1,226
    Rep Power
    538

    Exclamation Superman Returns

    Well… I suppose Superman Returns is what it is… a device used by Warner Brothers to re-launch a franchise full of promise and intrigue which hasn’t seen the lights of a screen since this author had hair and a much smaller waist. This was, for me, an event I have been LONG waiting for.

    I’ll break down my thoughts of this film into the most important areas without giving away too much of the plot.

    Story:

    Superman returns to Metropolis… Luthor is up to his old tactics again… and Superman is hurt that Lois has moved on. That’s about it… but the true magic of Superman is always an easily understandable plot, which I’ll grant the filmmakers this time. Okay, now let’s see how it’s executed.

    Casting:

    Going with an unknown for Superman was an excellent idea. Casting other names was also a good choice. But for me, these ‘names’ could have well been anyone standing in these roles. Take for example Frank Langella, the old school Dracula who typically plays a mean old man with doleful subtlety. What a waste… anyone could have played the part of Perry White, editor of The Daily Planet. He didn’t make it his own character… he didn’t OWN it as someone once had.

    Brandon Routh as Superman. The golden chalice of fame has been placed at his feet, yet I wouldn’t want to be in his shoes tonight. Imagine trying to live up to the distinction that Christopher Reeve set in motion. Nuff said. Did he take the cape to erase “Reeve” and write his own name? No. Did he do a good job? Absolutely! But did he manage to convince me he really was the man of steel? Not at all. And what about the duality of his character… Clark Kent and Superman? Okay, he’s no Bruce Wayne/Batman by any stretch, but there was little variance in each persona represented. At times watching this, all I had to do was squint my eyes, and Clark Kent was Superman. Posture, mannerisms and/or behavior were almost identical, just add or subtract some glasses and a comb. To me, his performance was two-dimensional… and at times, quite stale. There were moments where that could be disputed, but sadly… few and far between.

    Kate Bosworth as Lois Lane. Hats off to Mr. Singer for wrangling in this resplendent character. She added a depth and believability to Lois Lane that no other Superman movie has had to date. (Margot Kidder, IMO, was never a good choice in visual terms.) She conveyed not only sincerity, but also the emotional punch to give any audience member a TKO. Bravo, Ms. Bosworth.

    Execution:

    There will be countless arguments, pro and con about how a film is made and directed. No one will ever be completely happy with any film they feel so strongly about, and I for one can be included in that statement. I will shamelessly admit however, when those familiar opening credits flew across the screen, I honestly felt myself choke up… it took me back to my youth as the stirring John Williams’ theme made me want to jump up out of my seat and cheer for the man of steel all over again. But the pure magic of what Superman is, or was… was simply not there. I wanted this to be something special, and I feel that isn’t asking too much from the filmmakers. It’s a curse that beleaguered George Lucas when he made the last batch of Star Wars films.

    Lightening rarely strikes twice, and some would argue that Superman is just being taken into a new direction. That’s understandable, but if it is… why re-use footage from the 1978 film… and pick up five years after Superman II left off? (And publicly announce Richard Donner was consulted during this production.) If this is a new direction for Superman, then they should have started from scratch and created an entirely new legend.

    The story flowed as expected with few surprises save one, which I won’t spoil here. The powerful engine of Superman seemed to sputter towards the finish line and stall as it crossed it. I would say it was anti-climatic, but it didn’t feel like there was any satisfying resolution on any plot device introduced. I wanted the characters to absolve the obvious friction, and embrace their true motives… this was one of the biggest problems I had with the entire film. Off topic, but what the hell is it with films these days where nothing is resolved and story lines are left to dangle like cheap Christmas lights? For God’s sake, the reason why I go to see a movie is to escape and see things work out for the better good, or to get the girl (or guy) in the end. Make us cheer, Hollywood! Make us cry at the right moment, and give us a reason to appreciate what we DO have in our lives! Geez!!!

    Lex, explain to us why you really hate Superman so much! Just because you were in jail for five years? Come on, dude… show us the core of your motivation.

    Superman, baby… get your shovel and dig down further as to why you dumped the hottest babe on the planet. We want to know, and so does she. If it isn’t justified, then the script doctors should have performed surgery on that way back in story development. But it really took you FIVE years of hanging out in deep space to find absolutely nothing remaining of your home planet? What does someone do in the middle of deep space for five years? Yawwwwwn.

    But don’t cancel your movie night to see this just yet. It’s a fun ride with some great flying sequences that make the original set of films look like grade school fanfilms-- in special effect terms, that is. Its definitely worth seeing, but don’t hold your breath expecting to be blown away.

    Overall grade? C+

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Columbus, IN
    Posts
    608
    Rep Power
    419
    I saw Superman Returns last night, and I enjoyed it. The film is what it is, and does continue the story whare Superman 2 started to go. Some purists may not like a few of the things in it (I got in an argument with one of them after I saw the film). Brandon is not Chris Reeve, and never will be, and he was very good. The film as a whole was enjoyable if you let it be what it is, and I would recommend a brush up with II is you haven't seen it in a while, or haven't.

    The flying sequences were excellent, save one. THe promotional material from the Donner film of the 70s stated "You will believe a man can fly" is truely evident here. Great work in that area, and very exciting.

    The film is not without flaws, yet they story moves along well enough for me to oversee them.

    All in all, it is worth a theatrical viewing. I will be buying the DVD when it comes out, and adapt to the new Superman. I have a feeling he is going to be with us for a while.

    Jim

  3. #3
    I hope he's with us for a while, I don't know if I can handle another 5+ actors taking the role and then quitting/being fired/disappearing.
    Joshua C. Ramsey

    Become my fan on Facebook!
    http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1816412/resume

  4. #4

    Talking brandon routh is a sexy, sexy man

    so that has nothing to do with the movie itself, but it needed to be said

    loved the film. hated kate bosworth. too young for the role, and i completely disagree with chris. parker posey & kevin spacey were fabulous. i even liked the kid who played jimmy olson. (he was in not another teen movie - the oz character)

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Carmel
    Posts
    1,226
    Rep Power
    538
    So who's buying the DVD today? Anyone??

    *Crickets*

    Uh, I'll take 'Real Superman Movies' for $100, Alex.

    I am buying the Donner edition of Supe 2.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Knox, Indiana
    Posts
    311
    Rep Power
    350
    (mom writing)

    I probably won't buy it, but I am renting it.

    I might be in the minority, but I prefered it to the originals.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Indianapolis
    Posts
    2,218
    Rep Power
    1465
    Prob'ly won't buy the DVD. After seeing both Superman Returns and X-Men 3 this summer, I really wish Singer would have stuck with the X franchise, for both films' sake. SR was immeasurably better than X3, but thinking back to my experience with the movie, the biggest kick I remember getting out of it was hearing John Ottman's excellent re-mix (if you will) of the old John Williams classic themes in the score. It was fun, but didn't ultimately stick with me the way the Christopher Reeve/Richard Donner rendition did. (Of course, seeing those when I was a young boy kinda cemented that memory. There are plenty of dumb things about the Reeve movies, even the first.)

    I have to disagree about Kate Bosworth. She just doesn't make sense as Lois Lane, in much the same way that Katie Holmes didn't make sense as an assistant district attorney. She's what, 23? So that means that Lois was 18 when Superman left, and was already a star reporter for the Daily Planet? And when . . . oh, that's a spoiler, can't give that away . . . but that makes even less sense. And yes, fine, maybe the character is older, but she really didn't look much older than 23.
    Brian G. Hartz
    Actor, Director, Sound Designer, etc.

    "Standing ovations have become far too commonplace. What we need are ovations where the audience members all punch and kick one another." - George Carlin

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Carmel
    Posts
    1,226
    Rep Power
    538
    Good points, Brian! But Singer better hurry up, because at this rate, Kate Bosworth is gonna be a skeleton by the time they shoot it.

    *Shudders* God...

    I wonder if Bosworth will suffer the same fate as Mrs. Flying Saucer (Katie Holmes) did in Batman Begins?

  9. #9
    I saw "Superman Returns" at the theater and that was enough. I found it dull and tedious, especially toward the end of the movie. The special effects were great, as was the acting, but the movie didn't hold my interest after the first hour or so. I kept looking at my watch wondering when it would end.

    I like the idea of Superman, but all of the movies have left me wanting more (interesting story) or less (laughably ridiculous situations), including Christopher Reeves attempts as the man of steel. I thought that he was a good actor for the role, but I never bought the movies as anything other than camp.

    As an aside, I felt similarly about "Batman Begins," even though it received good reviews.
    Sooo, how's that whole "hopey-changey" thing working for you?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Indianapolis, IN
    Posts
    2,649
    Rep Power
    429
    Interesting, Superman Returns has been one of my favorite comic book movies to date! Mayhaps its a younger thing =(

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •